Thursday, May 7, 2009

Harmless Parody or Anti-Christian Humour? You Decide...

If you are using this OMG Blog then you probably are using other internet sites such as Facebook or MySpace (if you are a parent, you should certainly have a basic understanding of how these sites work, as you can be sure your kids are using them and posting photos and messages to them!).

I started using Facebook a couple of years ago. Initially, I was a regular user, and joined in with my friends in posting lots of photos and videos of my life and posting links and references I found enjoyable or provocative. As an example, I have posted a number of videos from the United Church Wondercafe, such as the "E-Z Answer Squirrell" (which I still love!), and list on my profile I am "Christian" and also am in a same-sex relationship and "engaged" to André Bernard.

Some time ago, I found a video on YouTube titled "Gay Scientists Isolate Christian Gene", which I found rather amusing as both a Christian and a gay man. I posted a link to the video on my Facebook page. Shortly afterwards, I essentially forgot about it.

Before I continue, I want you to watch the video in question, below:




What was your reaction to this video, as a Christian? Did you find it offensive or anti-Christian? Were you in fact offended? Did you find it somewhat or generally amusing? A clever parody of the "fuss" over whether there is a "gay gene" and what some people in the Christian church would want to do about it?

I've chosen this as my OMG Blog topic, because recently I received what I will call a "reminder" that the video was posted to my Facebook page - and a serious challenge to my sense of identity as a Christian.

We hear Linda each week refer to all of us as "lay preachers" and we discuss the difficulties we can experience in being "out" as Christians in what seems to be increasingly a non-Christian (or religious) world.

An acquaintance of mine from law school who I have as a "friend" on Facebook, responding to a post about a recent illness I experienced, must have spent some time reviewing my Facebook pages, and found the video. The following is the message I received:

-------------------------------------

"Hi Sean, I was a bit disappointed to see your link to the above video. As a Christian, I practice respect for every human being and stay away from anything that attempts to place people into artificial "groups," divide them from other (so-called more desirable) "groups", and then ridicule that group. That's actually how Hitler was so successful.

It's indeed unfortunate that as a gay man, who probably has been subjected to people's unfair judgement in your life, you now perpetuate the same thing. I know that I have been subjected to unfair judgement by many being a Christian, but I am not then going to turn around and do the same thing to them. Where does that get any of us as inhabitants of this planet? And where does it end?

I guess I expected more from you as a human being and a professional. I can assure you that even though you are ridiculing a group that I am a part of, I won't do the same thing to you.

P.S. Glad to read that you are feeling better. Food poisoning can be nasty."

-------------------------------------

Obviously my friend was offended and felt personally demeaned by my posting of the video on my Facebook page, and drew a distinction between us. I had to take a few days to sit and reflect and challenge myself on why, as a Christian, I found the video "humorous" rather than "offensive".

I think the best way of explaining my experience and reflection on the issue is to post the reply I sent to my friend, which I hope will provide some thoughts and reflection for you in considering the issue of humour vs. ridicule:

-------------------------------------

Thanks for writing. I've taken a few days to contemplate a response, as frankly your message took me somewhat by surprise, in both substance and tone.

Your message immediately makes a distinction between us, by stating "As a Christian, I practice...", as if we are in different groups.

If you actually read my profile, you would see clearly that I am also a Christian - I am getting married in July in a Christian (protestant) church that is inclusive and affirming, I have been an Elder and a Session member of my church, and I sing as a Tenor in my church choir. The post immediately below the "Christian Gene" video is the "E-Z Answer Squirrell" video from Wondercafe.ca of the United Church. That is partly why the same-sex marriage issue meant so much to me, personally and professionally. So, my appreciation of what I find is a humorous parody in that video does not come from a place of "ridicule" and difference. I simply don't see it that way at all. Frankly, I think it illustrates quite effectively that the position that many Christians do hold on the "gay issue" is plain silly.

Now, let's discuss unfair judgment. With the greatest amount of respect to you and whatever your personal faith or theology may be, as Christians we cannot escape or deny the fact that the mainstream Christian Church has for too long practiced more than "unfair judgment" against gays and lesbians - and in many places around the world, still does. Persecution is an appropriate word. Where does it end? A very good question.

We obviously see that video in very different lights. I don't see it as overt ridicule of Christianity or those who identify as Christian. Far from it. I see it, as a gay man, as a humorous parody of the right-wing, conservative theology and position on "homosexuality". It is a reversal of groups to highlight - with humor - the ways that certain groups excuse what otherwise is simple bigotry and discrimination, and in many cases can bleed into physical intimidation and persecution.

Now, understand me when I also say that I am the first to recognize there are elements - large ones - of the gay community that are very anti-Christian and ridicule "religion". In fact, there are elements of society, period, that are this way. However, as a gay man, who as you put it "probably has been subjected to people's unfair judgment", I understand and empathize with many who hold that view. Many gay people have been ostracized from spiritual and religious life by "the Church" and subjected to truly terrible forms of discrimination and even physical violence (see "www.godhatesfags.com" for an example of one form of "Christian love" in action).

Things are starting to change, and there are certainly a growing number of churches out there who truly embrace Gods love of diversity and inclusion of many different groups, and I am glad you appear to have the same approach. BUT, the truth is that many gays and lesbians have responded to rejection BY the Church with rejection OF the Church, and unfortunately, spiritual life. That also is starting to change, thanks in part to many courageous Christians who reject orthodoxy and conservative theology and actively practice inclusive faith in their everyday lives.

In closing, your last paragraph is the one that frankly causes me most concern (aside from the Hitler reference). I'm not sure why you felt the need to question my professionalism, but regardless your comments imply - with the greatest amount of respect - that we must be in different groups (i.e. gay does not equal Christian).

I do regret that you were so affected by the video and felt personally ridiculed. However, I hope you can perhaps understand my views on the matter, even if we do not agree. I hope you had a peaceful Easter.

---------------------------------------

What are your thoughts? Does the video cross the line into ridicule? Do you feel personally offended as a Christian? Or do you see it as humour or parody?

As Christians in what could be described as an increasingly hostile world, how sensitive are we OR should we be to such expressions of "humour"? Are we too relaxed or accepting? Should we be more offended or vigilant?

I look forward to sharing in your discussion of these issues through the month! Let the debate begin!

What do you think? Please click the comments link below and post your opinion.

Cheers,
Sean

2 comments:

  1. Sean,

    I enjoyed your OMG Blog Article.

    To me the video was amusing: a send up of what to me is an untenable approach - that gender identity is a lifestyle choice.

    Some who view the video will react that of course there is no 'Christian gene' and to suggest there is, is ridiculing them.  (They may not have considered the logic that if there is no Christian gene, then Christianity really is only a 'lifestyle choice', amongst many religions.) 

    Is there ridicule and is it appropriate?

    'Christians' covers a wide range of thoughts and beliefs.  Many Christians would not find ridicule (as opposed to an amusing send up) in the video.  Having said that, the majority of established Christianity (in terms of civic power and control - historically the Roman Catholic church and more recently US fundamentalists) have been discriminatory towards homosexuality and the GLBT communities.  To me, having some pointed words/videos to get them to rethink their approach is appropriate.

    This is an asymmetric approach  - and, for me, valid because of the historical power difference.  Consider the different status of 'whitey' and the n word.  Both could be considered insults by their targets.  But whitey is not as threatening (as the other) to its target - those with the power.  Using it might sometimes be appropriate and useful to instigate thinking about the power imbalance and the need for change.

    Thus in some ways the video is a test - how you feel about it says as much about you as the content itself. 

    As to the comments from your acquaintance, I note that the sentence:
    "As a Christian, I practice respect for every human being and stay away from anything that attempts to place people into artificial "groups", divide them from other (so-called more desirable) "groups", and then ridicule that group." To me, the sentence would be better without "As a Christian" as it seems to imply an artificially-too-narrow group of those people who practice respect for every human being. 
    I sometimes feel some people are trying to argue that "I am of X religion, so if you disagree with me you are discriminating against me because of my religion."

    A video (or a sentence) taken out of context may generate more heat than insight.  So what you did here is the best approach: tell people that the purpose is to generate a discussion of their response to the content.

    Best regards,
    Doug MacDonald

    ReplyDelete
  2. We should all take a huge step back and laugh at ourselves.

    ReplyDelete